Back to Search Start Over

Investigating the prediction value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors :
Minarikova, Lenka
Bogner, Wolfgang
Pinker, Katja
Valkovič, Ladislav
Zaric, Olgica
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Bartsch, Rupert
Helbich, Thomas
Trattnig, Siegfried
Gruber, Stephan
Valkovič, Ladislav
Helbich, Thomas H
Source :
European Radiology; May2017, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p1901-1911, 11p, 4 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To explore the predictive value of parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI at different time-points during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer.<bold>Methods: </bold>Institutional review board approval and written, informed consent from 42 breast cancer patients were obtained. The patients were investigated before and at three different time-points during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) using tumour diameter and volume from CE-MRI and ADC values obtained from drawn 2D and segmented 3D regions of interest. Prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic analysis.<bold>Results: </bold>There was no significant difference between pathologic complete response and non-pCR in baseline size measures (p > 0.39). Diameter change was significantly different in pCR (p < 0.02) before the mid-therapy point. The best predictor was lesion diameter change observed before mid-therapy (AUC = 0.93). Segmented volume was not able to differentiate between pCR and non-pCR at any time-point. The ADC values from 3D-ROI were not significantly different from 2D data (p = 0.06). The best AUC (0.79) for pCR prediction using DWI was median ADC measured before mid-therapy of NACT.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The results of this study should be considered in NACT monitoring planning, especially in MRI protocol designing and time point selection.<bold>Key Points: </bold>• Mid-therapy diameter changes are the best predictors of pCR in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. • Volumetric measures are not strictly superior in therapy monitoring to lesion diameter. • Size measures perform as a better predictor than ADC values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
27
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
122196874
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4565-2