Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the GOSAT TANSO-FTS TIR CH4 volume mixing ratio vertical profiles with those measured by ACE-FTS, ESA MIPAS, IMK-IAA MIPAS, and 16 NDACC stations.

Authors :
Olsen, Kevin S.
Strong, Kimberly
Walker, Kaley A.
Boone, Chris D.
Raspollini, Piera
Plieninger, Johannes
Bader, Whitney
Conway, Stephanie
Grutter, Michel
Hannigan, James W.
Hase, Frank
Jones, Nicholas
de Mazière, Martine
Notholt, Justus
Schneider, Matthias
Smale, Dan
Sussmann, Ralf
Naoko Saitoh
Source :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions; 2017, p1-35, 35p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The primary instrument on the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) is the Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observations (TANSO) Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS). TANSO-FTS uses three short-wave infrared (SWIR) bands to retrieve total columns of CO<subscript>2</subscript> and CH<subscript>4</subscript> along its optical line-of-sight, and one thermal infrared (TIR) channel to retrieve vertical profiles of CO<subscript>2</subscript> and CH<subscript>4</subscript> volume mixing ratios (VMRs) in the troposphere. We examine version 1 of the TANSO-FTS TIR CH<subscript>4</subscript> product by comparing co-located CH<subscript>4</subscript> VMR vertical profiles from two other remote sensing FTS systems: the Canadian Space Agency's Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment-FTS (ACE-FTS) on SCISAT (version 3.5), and the European Space Agency's Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat (ESA ML2PP version 6 and IMK-IAA reduced-resolution version V5R_CH4_224/225), as well as 16 ground stations with the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). This work follows an initial inter-comparison study over the Arctic, which incorporated a ground-based FTS at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) at Eureka, Canada, and focuses on tropospheric and lower-stratospheric measurements made at middle and tropical latitudes between 2009 to 2013 (mid 2012 for MIPAS). For comparison, vertical profiles from all instruments are interpolated onto a common pressure grid, and the ACE-FTS, MIPAS, and NDACC vertical profiles are smoothed using the TANSO-FTS averaging kernels. We present zonally-averaged mean CH<subscript>4</subscript> differences between each instrument and TANSO-FTS with and without smoothing, examine their information content, sensitive altitude range, correlation, a priori dependence, and the variability within each data set. Partial columns are calculated from the VMR vertical profiles, and their correlations are examined. We find that the TANSO-FTS vertical profiles agree with the ACE-FTS and both MIPAS retrievals' vertical profiles within 4% below 15km when smoothing is applied to the profiles from instruments with finer vertical resolution, but that the relative differences can increase to on the order of 25% when no smoothing is applied. Computed partial columns are tightly correlated for each pair of data sets. We investigated whether the difference between TANSO-FTS and other CH<subscript>4</subscript> VMR data products varies with latitude. Our study reveals a small dependence of around 0.1% per ten degrees latitude, with smaller differences over the equator, and greater differences towards the poles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18678610
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
122255907
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-6