Back to Search
Start Over
Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis.
- Source :
- Contemporary Clinical Dentistry; Apr-Jun2017, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p272-278, 7p
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Context: Marginal discrepancy influenced by the choice of processing material used for the ceramic laminate veneers needs to be explored further for better clinical application. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the amount of cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy associated with different ceramic laminate veneering materials. Settings and Design: This was an experimental, single-blinded, in vitro trial. Subjects and Methods: Ten central incisors were prepared for laminate veneers with 2 mm uniform reduction and heavy chamfer finish line. Ceramic laminate veneers fabricated over the prepared teeth using four different processing materials were categorized into four groups as Group I - aluminous porcelain veneers, Group II - lithium disilicate ceramic veneers, Group III - lithium disilicate-leucite-based veneers, Group IV - zirconia-based ceramic veneers. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy was measured using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy for four groups was Group I - 114.6 ± 4.3 µm, 132.5 ± 6.5 µm, Group II - 86.1 ± 6.3 µm, 105.4 ± 5.3 µm, Group III - 71.4 ± 4.4 µm, 91.3 ± 4.7 µm, and Group IV - 123.1 ± 4.1 µm, 142.0 ± 5.4 µm. ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD tests observed a statistically significant difference between the four test specimens with regard to cervical marginal discrepancy. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy scored F = 243.408, P < 0.001 and F = 180.844, P < 0.001, respectively. Conclusion: This study concluded veneers fabricated using leucite reinforced lithium disilicate exhibited the least marginal discrepancy followed by lithium disilicate ceramic, aluminous porcelain, and zirconia-based ceramics. The marginal discrepancy was more in the incisal region than in the cervical region in all the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0976237X
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 124313267
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_156_17