Back to Search Start Over

<italic>In‐vitro</italic> effect of pembrolizumab on different T regulatory cell subsets.

Authors :
Toor, S. M.
Syed Khaja, A. S.
Alkurd, I.
Elkord, E.
Source :
Clinical & Experimental Immunology; Feb2018, Vol. 191 Issue 2, p189-197, 10p, 4 Graphs
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Summary: Programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) and interactions with PD‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) play critical roles in the tumour evasion of immune responses through different mechanisms, including inhibition of effector T cell proliferation, reducing cytotoxic activity, induction of apoptosis in tumour‐infiltrating T cells and regulatory T cell (T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt;) expansion. Effective blockade of immune checkpoints can therefore potentially eliminate these detrimental effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of anti‐PD‐1 antibody, pembrolizumab, on various T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt; subpopulations. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy donors (HD) and primary breast cancer patients (PBC) were treated &lt;italic&gt;in vitro&lt;/italic&gt; with pembrolizumab, which effectively reduced PD‐1 expression in both cohorts. We found that PD‐1 was expressed mainly on CD4&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt;CD25&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt; T cells and pembrolizumab had a greater effect on PD‐1 expression in CD4&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt;CD25&lt;superscript&gt;−&lt;/superscript&gt; T cells, compared to CD4&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt;CD25&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt; cells. In addition, pembrolizumab did not affect the expression levels of T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt;‐related markers, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4), CD15s, latency‐associated peptide (LAP) and Ki‐67. Moreover, we report that CD15s is expressed mainly on forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)&lt;superscript&gt;−&lt;/superscript&gt;Helios&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt; T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt; in HD, but it is expressed on FoxP3&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt;Helios&lt;superscript&gt;−&lt;/superscript&gt; T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt; subset in addition to FoxP3&lt;superscript&gt;−&lt;/superscript&gt;Helios&lt;superscript&gt;+&lt;/superscript&gt; T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt; in PBC. Pembrolizumab did not affect the levels of FoxP3&lt;superscript&gt;+/−&lt;/superscript&gt;Helios&lt;superscript&gt;+/−&lt;/superscript&gt; T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt; subsets in both cohorts. Taken together, our study suggests that pembrolizumab does not affect T&lt;subscript&gt;reg&lt;/subscript&gt; or change their phenotype or function but rather blocks signalling via the PD‐1/PD‐L1 axis in activated T cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00099104
Volume :
191
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Clinical & Experimental Immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
127188712
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13060