Back to Search Start Over

Stochastic optimization methods for ship resistance and operational efficiency via CFD.

Authors :
Diez, Matteo
Campana, Emilio F.
Stern, Frederick
Source :
Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization; Feb2018, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p735-758, 24p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Hull-form stochastic optimization methods are presented and evaluated for resistance reduction and operational efficiency (operability), addressing stochastic sea state and operations. The cost/benefit analysis of the optimization procedure is presented by comparison of four hierarchical problems, from stochastic most general to deterministic least general. The parent hull is a high-speed catamaran, with geometrical constraints for maximum variation of length, beam, draft, and displacement. Problem 1 is used as a benchmark for the evaluation of the other problem formulations and is defined as a multi-objective stochastic optimization for resistance and operability, considering stochastic sea state and speed, but limited to head waves. Problem 2 is a multi-objective stochastic optimization for resistance and motions at fixed sea state and speed. Problem 3 is a multi-objective deterministic optimization for resistance and motions using a single regular wave at fixed speed. Problem 4 is a single-objective deterministic optimization for calm-water resistance at fixed speed. The design optimization is based on hull-form modifications by the Karhunen-Loève expansion of a free-form deformation, URANS-based CFD simulations, regular wave approximations for irregular waves, metamodels and multi-objective particle swarm. The design optimization achieves an 8.7, 23, 53, and 10% average improvements for problems 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Comparing to problem 1, problem 2, 3, 4 optimized designs have average performances 1, 2.1 and 1.7% worse, respectively. The most efficient problem, from the computational cost/benefit viewpoint, is problem 3. Nevertheless, problem 1 is needed to evaluate and compare the stochastic performance of the designs and finally assess the optimization cost/benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1615147X
Volume :
57
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
127610102
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1775-4