Back to Search Start Over

Validation of biplane high‐speed fluoroscopy combined with two different noninvasive tracking methodologies for measuring <italic>in vivo</italic> distal limb kinematics of the horse.

Authors :
Geiger, S. M.
Reich, E.
Böttcher, P.
Grund, S.
Hagen, J.
Source :
Equine Veterinary Journal; Mar2018, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p261-269, 9p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Summary: Reason for performing study: Biplane high‐speed fluoroscopy is a new method for gait analysis of the equine distal extremity. This is the first study validating the noninvasive tracking possibilities (Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping) taking equine anatomy into account. Objectives: To determine the resolution with which Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping depict motion of the equine phalanges in comparison to the invasive gold standard marker‐based registration. Study design: Comparative &lt;italic&gt;ex&#160;vivo&lt;/italic&gt; study. Methods: In 5 distal extremities of slaughtered ponies, 3 or 4 tantalum beads with 1&#160;mm diameter were implanted in each of the proximal, middle and distal phalangeal bones. Three‐dimensional models of the bones were reconstructed using computed tomographic data (120&#160;kV, 50&#160;mA, slice thickness 1&#160;mm, increment 0.5). The beads were digitally removed from the bone models. Biplane fluoroscopic videos were taken at 69.5&#160;&#177;&#160;3.5&#160;kV, 102.5&#160;&#177;&#160;22.5&#160;mA, 500&#160;frames/s and 0.5&#160;ms shutter speed. The 5 specimens were moved in the trial field of the biplane fluoroscopic setup in a step‐like motion (simulation of landing, main stance phase, lift‐off). Marker‐based registration, Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping were carried out. For statistical analysis agreement was computed as percentiles, mean and s.d. Results: The medians of Scientific Rotoscoping ranged from 0.16 to 0.66&#160;mm in translations and 0.43 to 2.78&#176; in rotations, while values for Autoscoping were 0.13–0.70&#160;mm and 0.28–2.39&#176; respectively. With 2 exceptions, all differences between methods were statistically significant. Scientific Rotoscoping is more time efficient than Autoscoping and results in smaller maximum errors. Main limitations: The experimental set‐up was specifically designed to accommodate &lt;italic&gt;in&#160;vivo&lt;/italic&gt; requirements. Autoscoping was not manually corrected but rather expected to work automatically. Conclusions: It is possible to noninvasively apply both Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping for gait analysis of the equine phalanges with high precision. &lt;bold&gt;The summary is available in Chinese ‐ see supporting information.&lt;/bold&gt; [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
04251644
Volume :
50
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Equine Veterinary Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
127765895
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12717