Back to Search
Start Over
Validation of biplane high‐speed fluoroscopy combined with two different noninvasive tracking methodologies for measuring <italic>in vivo</italic> distal limb kinematics of the horse.
- Source :
- Equine Veterinary Journal; Mar2018, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p261-269, 9p
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Summary: Reason for performing study: Biplane high‐speed fluoroscopy is a new method for gait analysis of the equine distal extremity. This is the first study validating the noninvasive tracking possibilities (Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping) taking equine anatomy into account. Objectives: To determine the resolution with which Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping depict motion of the equine phalanges in comparison to the invasive gold standard marker‐based registration. Study design: Comparative <italic>ex vivo</italic> study. Methods: In 5 distal extremities of slaughtered ponies, 3 or 4 tantalum beads with 1 mm diameter were implanted in each of the proximal, middle and distal phalangeal bones. Three‐dimensional models of the bones were reconstructed using computed tomographic data (120 kV, 50 mA, slice thickness 1 mm, increment 0.5). The beads were digitally removed from the bone models. Biplane fluoroscopic videos were taken at 69.5 ± 3.5 kV, 102.5 ± 22.5 mA, 500 frames/s and 0.5 ms shutter speed. The 5 specimens were moved in the trial field of the biplane fluoroscopic setup in a step‐like motion (simulation of landing, main stance phase, lift‐off). Marker‐based registration, Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping were carried out. For statistical analysis agreement was computed as percentiles, mean and s.d. Results: The medians of Scientific Rotoscoping ranged from 0.16 to 0.66 mm in translations and 0.43 to 2.78° in rotations, while values for Autoscoping were 0.13–0.70 mm and 0.28–2.39° respectively. With 2 exceptions, all differences between methods were statistically significant. Scientific Rotoscoping is more time efficient than Autoscoping and results in smaller maximum errors. Main limitations: The experimental set‐up was specifically designed to accommodate <italic>in vivo</italic> requirements. Autoscoping was not manually corrected but rather expected to work automatically. Conclusions: It is possible to noninvasively apply both Autoscoping and Scientific Rotoscoping for gait analysis of the equine phalanges with high precision. <bold>The summary is available in Chinese ‐ see supporting information.</bold> [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 04251644
- Volume :
- 50
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Equine Veterinary Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 127765895
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12717