Back to Search Start Over

18F-FDG and 68Ga-somatostatin analogs PET/CT in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: a comparison study.

Authors :
Taralli, Silvia
Sollini, Martina
Milella, Michele
Perotti, Germano
Filice, Angelina
Menga, Massimo
Versari, Annibale
Rufini, Vittoria
Source :
EJNMMI Research; 7/21/2018, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1-1, 1p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine skin tumor. Currently, <superscript>18</superscript>F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (<superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG) PET/CT is the functional imaging modality of choice. Few data are available on the use of <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin analogs. The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG and <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin analog PET/CT in MCC patients.Results: Fifteen patients (12 males, 3 females; median age 73 years; range 41-81 years) with histologically proven MCC (4 with unknown primary lesion) who underwent both <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG and <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin analog PET/CT for staging, re-staging, or treatment response assessment were retrospectively evaluated. Results of both studies were qualitatively analyzed and compared on a patient- and lesion-based analysis, using histology or clinical/radiological follow-up as reference standard for final diagnosis. According to final diagnosis, 8/15 patients had at least one MCC lesion and 7/15 had no evidence of disease. On a patient-based analysis, <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG and <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin analogs correctly classified as positive 8/8 (100% sensitivity) patients and as negative 6/7 (85.7% specificity) and 5/7 (71.4% specificity) patients, respectively, with no significant difference. On a lesion-based analysis, <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG detected 67/75 lesions (89%) and <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin analogs 69/75 (92%), with no significant difference. In four patients with unknown primary MCC, both tracers failed to identify the primary MCC site.Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG and <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin analog PET/CT provide good and equivalent diagnostic performance, adding interesting insights into the complex MCC biology. However, these results do not suggest that <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT should be replaced by <superscript>68</superscript>Ga-somatostatin receptor imaging, which should be performed in addition, according to clinical indication, to the perspective of “personalized medicine.” [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2191219X
Volume :
8
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
EJNMMI Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
130862313
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0423-3