Back to Search
Start Over
Do Urology Male Patients Prefer Same-Gender Urologist?
- Source :
- American Journal of Men's Health; Sep2018, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p1379-1383, 5p
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- There are several studies on patients’ preference for same-gender physicians, especially female preference for same-gender gynecologists. Data regarding the preferences of urology patients, of whom the majority are males, are scarce. The objective of this study is to assess provider gender preference among urology patients. One hundred and nineteen consecutive men (mean age 57.6 years) who attended a urology clinic in one university-affiliated medical center were prospectively enrolled. A self-accomplished 26-item anonymous questionnaire was used to assess patients’ preferences in selecting their urologist. Of the 119 patients, 51 (42.8%) preferred a male urologist. Patients exhibited more same-gender preference for physical examination (38.3%), or urological surgery (35.3%), than for consultation (24.4%). Most patients (97%) preferred a same-gender urologist because they felt less embarrassed. Four patient characteristics were identified to be significantly associated with preference for a male urologist: religious status, country of origin, marital status, and a prior management by a male urologist. Of these, religious status was the most predictive parameter for choosing a male urologist. The three most important factors that affected actual selection, however, were professional skills (84.6%), clinical experience (72.4%), and medical knowledge (61%), rather than physician gender per se. Many male patients express gender bias regarding their preference for urologist. However, professional skills of the clinician are considered to be more important factors when it comes to actually making a choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15579883
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- American Journal of Men's Health
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 131287642
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316650886