Back to Search Start Over

EARLINET evaluation of the CATS L2 aerosol backscatter coefficient product.

Authors :
Proestakis, Emmanouil
Amiridis, Vassilis
Marinou, Eleni
Binietoglou, Ioannis
Ansmann, Albert
Wandinger, Ulla
Hofer, Julian
Yorks, John
Nowottnick, Edward
Makhmudov, Abduvosit
Papayannis, Alexandros
Pietruczuk, Aleksander
Gialitaki, Anna
Apituley, Arnoud
Szkop, Artur
Muñoz Porcar, Constantino
Bortoli, Daniele
Dionisi, Davide
Althausen, Dietrich
Mamali, Dimitra
Source :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions; 2019, p1-30, 30p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

We present the evaluation activity of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) for the quantitative assessment of the Level 2 aerosol backscatter coefficient product derived by the Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS) onboard the International Space Station (ISS). The study employs correlative CATS and EARLINET backscatter measurements within 50 km distance between the ground station and the ISS overpass and as close in time as possible, typically within 90 min, from February 2015 to September 2016. The results demonstrate the good agreement of CATS Level 2 backscatter coefficient and EARLINET. Three ISS overpasses close to the EARLINET stations of Leipzig-Germany, Évora-Portugal and Dushanbe-Tajikistan are analysed here to demonstrate the performance of CATS lidar system under different conditions. The results show that under cloud-free, relative homogeneous aerosol conditions CATS is in good agreement with EARLINET, independently of daytime/nighttime conditions. CATS low negative biases, partially attributed to the deficiency of lidar systems to detect tenuous aerosol layers of backscatter signal below the minimum detection thresholds, may lead to systematic deviations and slight underestimations of the total Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) in climate studies. In addition, CATS misclassification of aerosol layers as clouds, and vice versa, in cases of coexistent and/or adjacent aerosol and cloud features, may lead to non-representative, unrealistic and cloud contaminated aerosol profiles. The distributions of backscatter coefficient biases show the relatively good agreement between the CATS and EARLINET measurements, although on average underestimations are observed, 22.3 % during daytime and 6.1 % during nighttime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16807367
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
135011240
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-45