Back to Search
Start Over
Background Heterogeneity and Other Uncertainties in Estimating Urban Methane Flux: Results from the Indianapolis Flux (INFLUX) Experiment.
- Source :
- Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions; 2019, p1-39, 39p
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- As natural gas extraction and use continues to increase, the need to quantify emissions of methane (CH<subscript>4</subscript>), a powerful greenhouse gas, has grown. Large discrepancies in Indianapolis CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions have been observed when comparing inventory, aircraft mass-balance, and tower inverse modeling estimates. Four years of continuous CH<subscript>4</subscript> mole fraction observations from a network of nine tower-based cavity ring-down spectrometers measuring atmospheric CH<subscript>4</subscript> mole fractions at 39 to 136 m above ground as part of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX) are utilized to investigate four possible reasons for the abovementioned inconsistencies: (1) differences in definition of the city domain, (2) a highly temporally variable and spatially non-uniform CH<subscript>4</subscript> background, (3) temporal variability in CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions, and (4) the presence of unknown CH<subscript>4</subscript> sources. Reducing the Indianapolis urban domain size to be consistent with the inventory domain size decreases the CH<subscript>4</subscript> emission estimation of the inverse modeling methodology by about 35 % and thereby lessens the discrepancy by bringing total city flux within an error range of one of the inventories. Nevertheless, the inverse modeling estimate still remains about 40 % higher than the inventory value. Hourly urban background CH<subscript>4</subscript> mole fractions are shown to be heterogeneous and temporally variable. Statistically significant, long-term biases in background mole fractions of 2–5 ppb are found from single point observations from most wind directions. Random errors in single point background mole fractions observed for a few hours are 20–30 ppb, but decrease substantially when data are averaged over multiple days. Boundary layer budget estimates suggest that Indianapolis CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions did not change significantly when comparing 2014 to 2016. However, it appears that CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions may follow a diurnal cycle with daytime emissions (12–16 LST) approximately twice as large as nighttime emissions (20–5 LST). The strongest CH<subscript>4</subscript> source in Indianapolis is the South Side Landfill. Other point sources, perhaps leaks from the natural gas distribution system, are localized and transient, and do not appear to be a consistently large source of CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions in Indianapolis. Long-term averaging, spatially-extensive upwind mole fraction observations, mesoscale atmospheric modeling of the regional emissions environment, and careful treatment of the times of day and areal representation of emission estimates is recommended for precise and accurate quantification of urban CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 16807367
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 135662297
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-48