Back to Search Start Over

Single-Reheating or Double-Reheating, Which is Better for S-CO2 Coal Fired Power Generation System?

Authors :
Sun, Enhui
Xu, Jinliang
Hu, Han
Yan, Chenshuai
Liu, Chao
Source :
Journal of Thermal Science; Jun2019, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p431-441, 11p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to provide the optimal choice of single-reheating or double-reheating when considering residual flue gas heat in S-CO<subscript>2</subscript> coal fired power system. The cascade utilization of flue gas energy includes three temperature levels, with high and low temperature ranges of flue gas heat extracted by S-CO<subscript>2</subscript> cycle and air preheater, respectively. Two methods are proposed to absorb residual flue gas heat Q<subscript>re</subscript> in middle temperature range. Both methods shall decrease CO<subscript>2</subscript> temperature entering the boiler T<subscript>4</subscript> and increase secondary air temperature T<subscript>sec air</subscript>, whose maximum value is deduced based on energy conservation in air preheater. The system is analyzed incorporating thermodynamics, boiler pressure drop and energy distribution. It is shown that at a given main vapor temperature T<subscript>5</subscript>, the main vapor pressure P<subscript>5</subscript> can be adjusted to a value so that Qre is completely eliminated, which is called the main vapor pressure adjustment method. For this method, single-reheating is only available for higher main vapor temperatures. The power generation efficiency for single-reheating is obviously higher than double-reheating. If residual flue gas heat does exist, a flue gas heater FGC is integrated with S-CO<subscript>2</subscript> cycle, which is called the FGC method. Both single-reheating and double-reheating share similar power generation efficiency, but single-reheating creates less residual flue gas heat. We conclude that single-reheating is preferable, and the pressure adjustment method achieves obviously higher power generation efficiency than the FGC method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10032169
Volume :
28
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Thermal Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
136203103
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-019-1130-8