Back to Search Start Over

Biomarker Matrix to Track Short Term Disease Progression in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients with Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors :
Marizzoni, Moira
Ferrari, Clarissa
Macis, Ambra
Jovicich, Jorge
Albani, Diego
Babiloni, Claudio
Cavaliere, Libera
Didic, Mira
Forloni, Gianluigi
Galluzzi, Samantha
Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
Molinuevo, José Luis
Nobili, Flavio
Parnetti, Lucilla
Payoux, Pierre
Pizzini, Francesca
Rossini, Paolo Maria
Salvatore, Marco
Schönknecht, Peter
Soricelli, Andrea
Source :
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease; 2019, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p49-58, 10p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Assessment of human brain atrophy in temporal regions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting state functional MRI connectivity in the left parietal cortex, and limbic electroencephalographic (rsEEG) rhythms as well as plasma amyloid peptide 42 (Aβ42) has shown that each is a promising biomarker of disease progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the value of their combined use is unknown.<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate the association with cognitive decline and the effect on sample size calculation when using a biomarker composite matrix in prodromal AD clinical trials.<bold>Methods: </bold>Multicenter longitudinal study with follow-up of 2 years or until development of incident dementia. APOE ɛ4-specific cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/P-tau cut-offs were used to identify aMCI with prodromal AD. Linear mixed models were performed 1) with repeated matrix values and time as factors to explain the longitudinal changes in ADAS-cog13, 2) with CSF Aβ42/P-tau status, time, and CSF Aβ42/P-tau status×time interaction as factors to explain the longitudinal changes in matrix measures, and 3) to compute sample size estimation for a trial implemented with the selected matrices.<bold>Results: </bold>The best composite matrix included the MRI volumes of hippocampal dentate gyrus and lateral ventricle. This matrix showed the best sensitivity to track disease progression and required a sample size 31% lower than that of the best individual biomarker (i.e., volume of hippocampal dentate gyrus).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Optimal matrices improved the statistical power to track disease development and to measure clinical progression in the short-term period. This might contribute to optimize the design of future clinical trials in MCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13872877
Volume :
69
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
136386495
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-181016