Back to Search Start Over

Concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and estrogen deprivation in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (CBCSG-036): A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.

Authors :
Yu, Ke‐Da
Wu, Si‐Yu
Liu, Guang‐Yu
Wu, Jiong
Di, Gen‐Hong
Hu, Zhen
Hou, Yi‐Feng
Chen, Can‐Ming
Fan, Lei
Tang, Li‐Chen
Shen, Zhen‐Zhou
Wu, Ke‐Jin
Zhuang, Zhi‐Gang
Zhang, Hong‐Wei
Shao, Zhi‐Ming
Yu, Ke-Da
Wu, Si-Yu
Liu, Guang-Yu
Di, Gen-Hong
Hou, Yi-Feng
Source :
Cancer (0008543X); 7/1/2019, Vol. 125 Issue 13, p2185-2193, 9p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The current randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy of concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and estrogen deprivation in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.<bold>Methods: </bold>Eligible patients with AJCC stage IIB to stage IIIC, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive NCT with or without estrogen deprivation. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 249 patients were assigned to either neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy (NCET) (125 patients) or the NCT group (124 patients). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the ORR was found to be significantly higher in the NCET group compared with the NCT group (84.8% vs 72.6%; odds ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.13-3.95; P = .02). The efficacy of NCET was more prominent in tumors with a higher Ki-67 index (>20%), with an ORR of 91.2% reported in the NCET group versus 68.7% in the NCT group (P = .001). The pathologic complete response and pathological response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Although there was no significant difference with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) between the 2 groups (P = .188), patients with a higher baseline Ki-67 index appeared to derive a greater PFS benefit from NCET (2-year PFS rate of 91.5% in the NCET group vs 76.5% in the NCT group; P = .058). Adding endocrine agents to NCT did not result in significant differences in adverse events (grade 3 or 4; graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) between the 2 groups.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The addition of estrogen deprivation to NCT appears to improve the clinical response in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, especially for those individuals with a higher Ki-67 index. Patients with a higher Ki-67 index might derive more PFS benefit from concurrent neoadjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
125
Issue :
13
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
137027536
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32057