Back to Search Start Over

Reappraisal of the suitability of corneas from bacteremic donors for use in corneal transplants.

Authors :
Hsiao-Sang Chu
Chun-Ting Lai
Yu-Chih Hou
Hsin-Yu Liu
I-Jong Wang
Wei-Li Chen
Chung-Liang Shih
Fung-Rong Hu
Source :
British Journal of Ophthalmology; Aug2019, Vol. 103 Issue 8, p1030-1034, 5p, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background This study examined whether corneas from bacteremic donors could be used for corneal transplant. Methods Corneas donated to the National Eye Bank of Taiwan between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2017 were included in this study. All the corneas had corneoscleral rim cultures during the retrieval process and were hypothermic preserved in the Optisol-GS storage medium. A microbial work-up flow chart was used for the sterility check of all grafts. Bacteremic donors were defined as those whose last blood culture before corneal donation was positive. The microbial contamination rates, the endothelial cell densities, the tissue utility rates and early complications after transplants were compared between the corneas from bacteremic versus nonbacteremic donors. Results 697 corneas from 356 donors were analysed, 70 of which were from bacteremic donors. The microbial contamination rates of the corneas from bacteremic and non-bacteremic donors (7.1% vs 9.1%)(p=0.30) were close. None of the contaminated corneas grew the same bacterial strains as those from their blood cultures. The corneas from bacteremic donors and non-bacteremic donors have similar endothelial cell densities (2931±297 cells/mm<superscript>2</superscript> vs 2903 ± 470 cells/mm<superscript>2</superscript>) (p=0.63). Corneas from bacteremic and non-bacteremic donors shared a similar utility rate (98.6% vs 99.4%)(p=0.41). None of the corneas caused infectious complications after transplants. Conclusion Our study showed that corneas from bacteremic and non-bacteremic donors have equally low contamination rates and are of the same quality in terms of endothelial cell density and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00071161
Volume :
103
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
137842140
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312816