Back to Search Start Over

Classifying exoplanet candidates with convolutional neural networks: application to the Next Generation Transit Survey.

Authors :
Chaushev, Alexander
Raynard, Liam
Goad, Michael R
Eigmüller, Philipp
Armstrong, David J
Briegal, Joshua T
Burleigh, Matthew R
Casewell, Sarah L
Gill, Samuel
Jenkins, James S
Nielsen, Louise D
Watson, Christopher A
West, Richard G
Wheatley, Peter J
Udry, Stéphane
Vines, Jose I
Source :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; Oct2019, Vol. 488 Issue 4, p5232-5250, 19p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Vetting of exoplanet candidates in transit surveys is a manual process, which suffers from a large number of false positives and a lack of consistency. Previous work has shown that convolutional neural networks (CNN) provide an efficient solution to these problems. Here, we apply a CNN to classify planet candidates from the Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS). For training data sets we compare both real data with injected planetary transits and fully simulated data, as well as how their different compositions affect network performance. We show that fewer hand labelled light curves can be utilized, while still achieving competitive results. With our best model, we achieve an area under the curve (AUC) score of |$(95.6\pm {0.2}){{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| and an accuracy of |$(88.5\pm {0.3}){{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| on our unseen test data, as well as |$(76.5\pm {0.4}){{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| and |$(74.6\pm {1.1}){{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| in comparison to our existing manual classifications. The neural network recovers 13 out of 14 confirmed planets observed by NGTS, with high probability. We use simulated data to show that the overall network performance is resilient to mislabelling of the training data set, a problem that might arise due to unidentified, low signal-to-noise transits. Using a CNN, the time required for vetting can be reduced by half, while still recovering the vast majority of manually flagged candidates. In addition, we identify many new candidates with high probabilities which were not flagged by human vetters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00358711
Volume :
488
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138318254
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2058