Back to Search Start Over

Early and long-term results of aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery for bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.

Authors :
Karciauskas, Dainius
Mizariene, Vaida
Jakuska, Povilas
Ereminiene, Egle
Orda, Paulius
Ordiene, Rasa
Vaskelyte, Jolanta Justina
Nedzelskiene, Irena
Kinduris, Sarunas
Benetis, Rimantas
Source :
Perfusion; Sep2019, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p482-489, 8p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate early and long-term clinical outcomes following aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery in patients with leaking bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Methods: The study consisted of 92 consecutive adult patients (tricuspid aortic valve group = 63 and bicuspid aortic valve group = 29) who underwent aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery with or without aortic cusp repair for dilatation of the aortic root and/or aortic valve regurgitation at our institution from April 2004 to October 2016. Clinical outcomes were investigated using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests between groups. Results: The follow-up was 100% complete with a mean time of 5.3 ± 3.3 years. The 30-day in-hospital mortality was 3.1% in tricuspid aortic valve group and 3.4% in bicuspid aortic valve group patients. The overall survival rates at 10 years did not differ between bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve patient groups (96.6 ± 3.3% vs. 90.3 ± 4.2%, p = 0.3). Freedom from recurrent aortic valve regurgitation (>2+) at 10 years was 90.5 ± 4.1% in tricuspid aortic valve group and 75.7 ± 8.7% in bicuspid aortic valve group (p = 0.06). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 10 years was 100% in tricuspid aortic valve group and 83.9 ± 7.4% in bicuspid aortic valve group (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery is a safe and efficient technique, providing acceptable long-term survival with low rates of valve-related complications in both tricuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortic valve patient groups. However, aortic valve reoperation rates at 10 years follow-up were higher in bicuspid aortic valve group patients compared to tricuspid aortic valve group patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02676591
Volume :
34
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Perfusion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138497454
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659119831926