Back to Search Start Over

The Randomized Freeway Stent Study: Drug-Eluting Balloons Outperform Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Postdilatation of Nitinol Stents in the SFA and PI Segment.

Authors :
Tacke, Josef
Müller-Hülsbeck, Stephan
Schröder, Henrik
Lammer, Johannes
Schürmann, Karl
Gross-Fengels, Walter
Fischbach, Roman
Textor, Jochen
Boguth, Lothar
Loewe, Christian
Häuser, Hannes
Gschwendtner, Manfred
Tepe, Gunnar
von Strandmann, Rembert Pogge
Stahnke, Stefanie
Dambach, Johannes
Hausegger, Klaus
Source :
CardioVascular & Interventional Radiology; Nov2019, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p1513-1521, 9p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>The prospective randomized multicenter Freeway study evaluated the possible hemodynamic and clinical benefits of primary stent insertion followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with drug-eluting balloons (DEB) over post-stent insertion PTA with standard balloons in the treatment of symptomatic femoropopliteal arteriosclerotic lesions.<bold>Methods: </bold>In total, 204 patients in 13 centers in Germany and Austria were enrolled and randomized to primary stenting followed by either FREEWAY™ drug-eluting balloon or standard PTA balloon angioplasty. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months; the secondary endpoints include TLR rate at 12 months and primary patency, shift in Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index (ABI) and major adverse events (MAE) at 6 and 12 months. Lesion characteristics and vessel patency were analyzed by an independent and blinded corelab.<bold>Results: </bold>At 6-month and 12-month follow-up, TLR rate was lower in the DEB arm compared to standard PTA but did not reach statistical significance (4.1% vs. 9.0% p = 0.234 and 7.9% vs. 17.7% p = 0.064, respectively). Primary patency was significantly better for patients treated with the DEB at 6 months (90.3% vs. 69.8% p = 0.001) and 12 months (77.4% vs. 61.0% p = 0.027). Improvement in Rutherford classifications was likewise significantly better for patients in the DEB group at 6 (94.9% vs. 84.3% p = 0.027) and 12 months (95.5% vs. 79.9% p = 0.003). The percentage of patients with an improved ABI of 1.0-1.2 was significantly higher in the DEB group compared to the PTA group at 6 months (55.3% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.015) but without significant difference at 12 months (48.2% vs. 32.9%; p = 0.055). At 6 months, rate of major adverse events (MAE) was 1% in both arms, and at 12 months 2.2% for the DEB and 3.8% for the PTA group.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The Freeway Stent Study shows that the usage of DEB as a restenosis prophylaxis seems to be safe and feasible. The 12-month follow-up results give a clear sign in favor of the DEB group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01741551
Volume :
42
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
CardioVascular & Interventional Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138912218
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-019-02309-3