Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of Clutch Cutter for Standardizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors :
Dohi, Osamu
Yoshida, Naohisa
Terasaki, Kei
Azuma, Yuka
Ishida, Tsugitaka
Kitae, Hiroaki
Matsumura, Shinya
Ogita, Kazuyuki
Takayama, Shun
Mizuno, Naoki
Nakano, Takahiro
Hirose, Ryohei
Inoue, Ken
Kamada, Kazuhiro
Uchiyama, Kazuhiko
Ishikawa, Takeshi
Takagi, Tomohisa
Kishimoto, Mitsuo
Konishi, Hideyuki
Naito, Yuji
Source :
Digestion; 2019, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p201-209, 9p, 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using the Clutch Cutter (CC), a scissor-type knife, compared with those of procedures using conventional devices. Methods: This single-center retrospective study evaluated 237 patients with early gastric cancer: 83 who underwent ESD using the CC group and 154 who underwent ESD using the insulated-tip knife 2 (IT2 group). Clinicopathological features and technical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using a propensity score-matched analysis. Results: In 61 pairs of matched patients, there was no significant difference in R0 resection, perforation, or postoperative bleeding between the CC and IT2 groups. Comparisons between the 2 groups showed similar treatment outcomes for an expert endoscopist. Nevertheless, there were significant differences between the 2 groups for nonexperts in terms of self-completion (61.7 and 24.5%, respectively, p < 0.001), mean procedure times (45 and 61 min, respectively, p = 0.002), and mean numbers of intraoperative bleeding points and bleeding points requiring hemostatic forceps (3 and 0 vs. 8 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Better self-completion rates and shorter procedure times were noted for gastric ESD using the CC by nonexperts than for that using IT2, probably due to hemostatic efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00122823
Volume :
100
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Digestion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138955680
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000495287