Back to Search Start Over

Front‐line treatment of ceritinib improves efficacy over crizotinib for Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion NSCLC: The role of systemic progression control.

Authors :
Huang, Shih‐Hao
Huang, Allen Chung‐Cheng
Wang, Chin‐Chou
Chang, Wen‐Chen
Liu, Chien‐Ying
Pavlidis, Stelios
Ko, Ho‐Wen
Chung, Fu‐Tsai
Hsu, Ping‐Chih
Guo, Yi‐Ke
Kuo, Chih‐Hsi Scott
Yang, Cheng‐Ta
Source :
Thoracic Cancer; Dec2019, Vol. 10 Issue 12, p2274-2281, 8p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Approximately 3%–5% of lung adenocarcinoma is driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene, whose activity can be suppressed by multiple ALK inhibitors. Crizotinib and ceritinib have demonstrated superior efficacy to platinum‐based chemotherapy as front‐line treatment for patients with ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the direct comparison between them in the front‐line setting remains lacking. Methods: A total of 48 patients with ALK‐positive, previously untreated advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib and ceritinib as front‐line treatment were retrospectively investigated. The efficacy and pattern of disease progression were analyzed. Results: Patients receiving ceritinib treatment were significantly younger than those receiving crizotinib treatment (52.0 vs. 63.0, P = 0.016). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with ceritinib than with crizotinib treatment (32.3 vs. 12.9 months; log‐rank P = 0.020); the hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.08–0.90; P = 0.033). An objective response was noted in all patients in the ceritinib group and in 23 patients in the crizotinib group (74.2%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 88.5). The rate of systemic progression was significantly lower over time with ceritinib treatment compared to crizotinib treatment (cause‐specific hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.73; P = 0.014). Serious adverse events were noted in one (2.9%) patient showing elevated liver function in the crizotinib group and three (23.1%) patients showing diarrhea in the ceritinib group. Dose reduction was needed in five out of 13 (38.5%) patients receiving ceritinib treatment. Conclusion: Ceritinib showed higher efficacy associated with a better control of systemic progression compared to crizotinib for the front‐line treatment of ALK‐positive advanced NSCLCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17597706
Volume :
10
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Thoracic Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
139960377
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13221