Evaluating the surface energy partitioning in ERA5.

Climate reanalyses provide a plethora of global atmospheric and surface parameters in a consistent manner over multi-decadal time scales. Hence, they are widely-used in many fields, and an in-depth evaluation of the different variables provided by reanalyses is a necessary means to provide feedback on the quality to their users and the operational centers producing these data sets, and to help guiding their development. Recently, the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) released the new state-of-the-art climate reanalysis ERA5, following up on its popular predecessor ERA-Interim. Different sets of variables from ERA5 were already evaluated in a handful of studies, but so far, the quality of surface energy partitioning has not been assessed yet. Here, we evaluate the surface energy partitioning over land in ERA5, and concentrate on the appraisal of the surface latent heat flux, surface sensible heat flux, and Bowen ratio against different reference data sets and using different modelling tools. Most of our analyses point towards a better quality of surface energy partitioning in ERA5 than in ERA-Interim, which may be attributed to a better representation of land-surface processes in ERA5, and certainly to the better quality of near-surface meteorological variables. One of the key shortcomings of the reanalyses identified in our study is the overestimation of the surface latent heat flux, which - although substantially lower than in ERA-Interim - still remains in ERA5. Overall, our results indicate the high quality of the surface turbulent fluxes from ERA5 and the general improvement upon ERA-Interim, thereby endorsing the efforts of ECMWF to improve their climate reanalysis and to provide useful data to many scientific and operational fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]