Air pollution control strategies directly limiting national health damages in the US.

Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) from fuel combustion significantly contributes to global and US mortality. Traditional control strategies typically reduce emissions for specific air pollutants and sectors to maintain pollutant concentrations below standards. Here we directly set national PM_2.5 mortality cost reduction targets within a global human-earth system model with US state-level energy systems, in scenarios to 2050, to identify endogenously the control actions, sectors, and locations that most cost-effectively reduce PM_2.5 mortality. We show that substantial health benefits can be cost-effectively achieved by electrifying sources with high primary PM_2.5 emission intensities, including industrial coal, building biomass, and industrial liquids. More stringent PM_2.5 reduction targets expedite the phaseout of high emission intensity sources, leading to larger declines in major pollutant emissions, but very limited co-benefits in reducing CO₂ emissions. Control strategies limiting health damages achieve the greatest emission reductions in the East North Central and Middle Atlantic states. Decoupling emission reduction target determination, air pollution modelling, and health benefit estimation complicates control strategy design. Here an integrated approach identifies strategies to reduce health damages of air pollution, showing that benefits can be achieved cost-effectively by electrifying sources with high primary PM_2.5 emission intensities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]