Back to Search Start Over

Effective Radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols - a multimodel comparison.

Authors :
Thornhill, Gillian D.
Collins, William J.
Kramer, Ryan J.
OliviƩ, Dirk
O'Connor, Fiona
Abraham, Nathan L.
Bauer, Susanne E.
Makoto Deushi
Emmons, Louisa
Forster, Piers
Horowitz, Larry
Johnson, Ben
Keeble, James
Lamarque, Jean-Francois
Michou, Martine
Mills, Mike
Mulcahy, Jane
Myhre, Gunnar
Nabat, Pierre
Naik, Vaishali
Source :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions; 3/13/2020, p1-29, 29p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

This paper quantifies the effective radiative forcing from CMIP6 models of the present-day anthropogenic emissions of NO<subscript>x</subscript>, CO, VOCs, SO<subscript>2</subscript>, NH<subscript>3</subscript>, black carbon and primary organic carbon. Effective radiative forcing from pre-industrial to present-day changes in the concentrations of methane, N<subscript>2</subscript>O and halocarbons are quantified and attributed to their anthropogenic emissions. Emissions of reactive species can cause multiple changes in the composition of radiatively active species: tropospheric ozone, stratospheric ozone, secondary inorganic and organic aerosol and methane. We therefore break down the ERFs from each emitted species into the contributions from the composition changes. The 1850 to 2014 mean ERFs are 1.1 ± 0.07 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for sulfate, -0.24 ± 0.01 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for organic carbon (OC), and 0.15 ± 0.04 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for black carbon (BC), and for the aerosols combined it is -0.95 ± 0.03 W m<superscript>-2</superscript>. The means for the reactive gases are 0.69 ± 0.04 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for methane (CH<subscript>4</subscript>), 0.06 ± 0.04 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for NO<subscript>x</subscript>, -0.09 ± 0.03 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for volatile organic carbons (VOC), 0.16 ± 0.03 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for ozone (O<subscript>3</subscript>), 0.27 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for nitrous oxide (N<subscript>2</subscript>O) and -0.02 ± 0.06 W m<superscript>-2</superscript> for hydrocarbon (HC). Differences in ERFs calculated for the different models reflect differences in the complexity of their aerosol and chemistry schemes, especially in the case of methane where tropospheric chemistry captures increased forcing from ozone production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16807367
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
142222187
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-1205