Back to Search Start Over

How do the costs of physical therapy and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy compare? A trial-based economic evaluation of two treatments in patients with meniscal tears alongside the ESCAPE study.

Authors :
de Graaf Johanna M. van Dongen, Victor A. van
Willigenburg, Nienke W.
Noorduyn, Julia C. A.
Butter, Ise K.
de Gast, Arthur
Saris, Daniel B. F.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Poolman, Rudolf W.
van de Graaf, Victor A
van Dongen, Johanna M
ESCAPE Research Group
Source :
British Journal of Sports Medicine; May2020, Vol. 54 Issue 9, p538-546, 9p, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>To examine whether physical therapy (PT) is cost-effective compared with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in patients with a non-obstructive meniscal tear, we performed a full trial-based economic evaluation from a societal perspective. In a secondary analysis-this paper-we examined whether PT is non-inferior to APM.<bold>Methods: </bold>We recruited patients aged 45-70 years with a non-obstructive meniscal tear in nine Dutch hospitals. Resource use was measured using web-based questionnaires. Measures of effectiveness included knee function using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Follow-up was 24 months. Uncertainty was assessed using bootstrapping techniques. The non-inferiority margins for societal costs, the IKDC and QALYs, were €670, 8 points and 0.057 points, respectively.<bold>Results: </bold>We randomly assigned 321 patients to PT (n=162) or APM (n=159). PT was associated with significantly lower costs after 24 months compared with APM (-€1803; 95% CI -€3008 to -€838). The probability of PT being cost-effective compared with APM was 1.00 at a willingness to pay of €0/unit of effect for the IKDC (knee function) and QALYs (quality of life) and decreased with increasing values of willingness to pay. The probability that PT is non-inferior to APM was 0.97 for all non-inferiority margins for the IKDC and 0.89 for QALYs.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The probability of PT being cost-effective compared with APM was relatively high at reasonable values of willingness to pay for the IKDC and QALYs. Also, PT had a relatively high probability of being non-inferior to APM for both outcomes. This warrants further deimplementation of APM in patients with non-obstructive meniscal tears.<bold>Trial Registration Numbers: </bold>NCT01850719 and NTR3908. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03063674
Volume :
54
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
142915750
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100065