Back to Search Start Over

Patterns of Extrathoracic Metastases in Different Histological Types of Lung Cancer.

Authors :
Wang, Xuan
Wang, Zheng
Pan, Junjie
Lu, Zhou-Yi
Xu, Dong
Zhang, Hui-Jun
Wang, Shao-Hua
Huang, Da-Yu
Chen, Xiao-Feng
Source :
Frontiers in Oncology; 5/19/2020, Vol. 11, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths mainly attributable to metastasis, especially extrathoracic metastasis. This large-cohort research is aimed to explore metastatic profiles in different histological types of lung cancer, as well as to assess clinicopathological and survival significance of diverse metastatic lesions. Lung cancer cases were extracted and enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. χ<superscript>2</superscript>-tests were conducted to make comparisons of metastatic distribution among different histological types and odds ratios were calculated to analyze co-occurrence relationships between different metastatic lesions. Kaplan–Meier methods were performed to analyze survival outcomes according to different metastatic sites and Cox regression models were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. In total, we included 159,241 lung cancer cases with detailed metastatic status and complete follow-up information. In order to understand their metastatic patterns, we elucidated the following points in this research: (1) Comparing the frequencies of different metastatic lesions in different histological types. The frequency of bone metastasis was highest in adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, LCLC and NSCLC/NOS, while liver was the most common metastatic site in SCLC. (2) Elaborating the tendency of combined metastases. Bi-site metastases occurred more common than tri-site and tetra-site metastases. And several metastatic sites, such as bone and liver, intended to co-metastasize preferentially. (3) Clarifying the prognostic significance of single-site and bi-site metastases. All single-site metastases were independent prognostic factors and co-metastases ended up with even worse survival outcomes. Thus, our findings would be beneficial for research design and clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2234943X
Volume :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
143346790
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00715