Influences of Polydisperse Sea Spray Size Distributions on Model Predictions of Air‐Sea Heat Fluxes.

Quantifying the influence of sea spray on air‐sea fluxes under high‐wind conditions is challenging due to a variety of factors. Among existing models, the so‐called bulk air‐sea flux model is commonly used in meteorological applications due to its simplicity, which often involves strong but untested assumptions on spray‐mediated heat fluxes and feedback effects. For example, a common assumption is to treat each droplet size as an independent contribution; that is, it does not interact with other sizes. Thus, the interactions between different size classes of spray are often neglected. In this study, we focus on the polydispersity of the spray size distribution and investigate the appropriateness of assuming an independent contribution from different spray size classes. We implement direct numerical simulations (DNS) with Lagrangian tracking of spray droplets. Based on DNS results, the bulk spray model fails to capture the interactions between different sizes that are observed directly from the droplet and feedback statistics in DNS. Thus, assuming independent contributions from spray droplets results in significant overestimates on the total heat fluxes. We further test different representative sizes of a spray size distribution. We find that the volume‐weighted representative size is capable of predicting the droplet‐modified temperature and humidity fields and generally captures the vertical profiles of spray‐mediated and interfacial heat fluxes. The results indicate that the computation of spray‐mediated fluxes can be simplified in large‐scale parameterizations. Key Points: Directly adding all contributions from spray droplets in bulk models may introduce overestimates on spray‐mediated heat fluxesWe improved the overestimation issue in bulk model for the total heat flux by considering the effects of spray time scalesUsing the volume‐weighted mean size as a representative size could simplify the quantifying of air‐sea fluxes in an Eulerian framework [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]