Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the Specific Attenuation Method for Radar-Based Quantitative Precipitation Estimation: Improvements and Practical Challenges.

Authors :
BONG-CHUL SEO
KRAJEWSKI, WITOLD F.
RYZHKOV, ALEXANDER
Source :
Journal of Hydrometeorology; Jun2020, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p1333-1347, 15p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

This study demonstrates an implementation of the prototype quantitative precipitation R estimation algorithm using specific attenuation A for S-band polarimetric radar. The performance of R(A) algorithm is assessed, compared to the conventional algorithm using radar reflectivity Z, at multiple temporal scales. Because the factor a, defined as the net ratio of A to specific differential phase, is a key parameter of the algorithm characterized by drop size distributions (e.g., differential reflectivity Z<subscript>dr</subscript> dependence on Z), the estimation equations of a and a proper number of Z<subscript>dr</subscript>-Z samples required for a reliable a estimation are examined. Based on the dynamic estimation of a, the event-based evaluation using hourly rain gauge observations reveals that the performance of R(A) is superior to that of R(Z), with better agreement and lower variability. Despite its superiority, the study finds that R(A) leads to quite consistent overestimations of about 10%-30%. It is demonstrated that the application of uniform a over the entire radar domain yields the observed uncertainty because of the heterogeneity of precipitation in the domain. A climatological range-dependent feature of R(A) and R(Z) is inspected in the multiyear evaluation at yearly scale using rain totals for April-October. While R(Z) exposes a systematic shift and overestimation, each of which arise from the radarmiscalibration and bright band effects, R(A) combining with multiple R(Z) values for solid/mixed precipitation shows relatively robust performance without those effects. The immunity of R(A) to partial beam blockage (PBB) based on both qualitative and quantitative analyses is also verified. However, the capability of R(A) regarding PBB is limited by the presence of the melting layer and its application requirement for the total span of differential phase (e.g., 3°), which is another challenge for light rain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1525755X
Volume :
21
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
145396782
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0030.1