Back to Search Start Over

Four‐week outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration.

Authors :
Wiryasaputra, Shaan
Nguyen, Vuong
Arnold, Jennifer J.
Ferrier, Ross
Hinchcliffe, Peter
Barthelmes, Daniel
Gillies, Mark C.
Source :
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology; Sep2020, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p946-955, 10p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Importance: To assess early outcomes of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor treatment in neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (nAMD) before patients have a chance to miss or discontinue treatment. Background: Intravitreal VEGF inhibitors used to treat nAMD have been compared in various ways. The present study compared the 4‐week responses to the first injection of either aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab. Design: Observational study. Participants: Treatment‐naïve nAMD patients with visual acuity (VA) taken 22 to 48 days after the first treatment with an intravitreal VEGF inhibitor. Methods: An observational study from a prospectively designed database. Main outcome measures: VA change from baseline and proportion of eyes judged active 22 to 48 days after the first treatment. Results: The overall mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change at 4 weeks was +3.7 (3.3, 4.0) letters. No pairwise comparisons in crude VA change or VA change after multivariate adjustment between the three agents were significant. However, after multivariate adjustment, more eyes treated with bevacizumab (90%) had active disease 4 weeks after the first injection than ranibizumab (84%; P =.013) and aflibercept (82%; P =.004). Older age, higher baseline vision and larger lesions were associated with lower VA change. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in VA gains amongst all three drugs but ranibizumab and aflibercept seemed to be more efficacious in quelling disease activity 4 weeks after the first treatment. VA change after the first injection was driven largely by baseline characteristics such as age, baseline VA and lesion size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14426404
Volume :
48
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146395433
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13798