Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Glucose Sensor during Aerobic, Resistance, and Interval Exercise in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors :
Guillot, Florian H.
Jacobs, Peter G.
Wilson, Leah M.
Youssef, Joseph El
Gabo, Virginia B.
Branigan, Deborah L.
Tyler, Nichole S.
Ramsey, Katrina
Riddell, Michael C.
Castle, Jessica R.
Source :
Biosensors (2079-6374); Oct2020, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p138-138, 1p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors may be significantly impacted by exercise. We evaluated the impact of three different types of exercise on the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 sensor. Twenty-four adults with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections wore a G6 sensor. Participants were randomized to aerobic, resistance, or high intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise. Each participant completed two in-clinic 30-min exercise sessions. The sensors were applied on average 5.3 days prior to the in-clinic visits (range 0.6–9.9). Capillary blood glucose (CBG) measurements with a Contour Next meter were performed before and after exercise as well as every 10 min during exercise. No CGM calibrations were performed. The median absolute relative difference (MARD) and median relative difference (MRD) of the CGM as compared with the reference CBG did not differ significantly from the start of exercise to the end exercise across all exercise types (ranges for aerobic MARD: 8.9 to 13.9% and MRD: −6.4 to 0.5%, resistance MARD: 7.7 to 14.5% and MRD: −8.3 to −2.9%, HIIT MARD: 12.1 to 16.8% and MRD: −14.3 to −9.1%). The accuracy of the no-calibration Dexcom G6 CGM was not significantly impacted by aerobic, resistance, or HIIT exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20796374
Volume :
10
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Biosensors (2079-6374)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146660106
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10100138