Back to Search Start Over

Prostate cancer grading, time to go back to the future.

Authors :
Egevad, Lars
Delahunt, Brett
Bostwick, David G.
Cheng, Liang
Evans, Andrew J.
Gianduzzo, Troy
Graefen, Markus
Hugosson, Jonas
Kench, James G.
Leite, Katia R.M.
Oxley, Jon
Sauter, Guido
Srigley, John R.
Stattin, Pär
Tsuzuki, Toyonori
Yaxley, John
Samaratunga, Hemamali
Source :
BJU International; Feb2021, Vol. 127 Issue 2, p165-168, 4p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Abbreviation ISUP International Society of Urological Pathology In November 2014, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) convened a consensus meeting in Chicago, Illinois, USA to consider grading criteria for prostatic adenocarcinoma [1]. While cribriform cancer used to be included in either Gleason pattern 3 or 4, depending on the size and shape of the glands, the ISUP 2014 revision considers all cribriform cancer to be Gleason pattern 4, or even 5 if comedonecrosis is present [19]. An explanation for this increasing interest may be that the Gleason inflation that was fueled by the ISUP 2005 consensus recommendations has pushed a considerable number of cancers from Gleason score 6 to 7 [21]. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. [Extracted from the article]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14644096
Volume :
127
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BJU International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148541329
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15298