Back to Search Start Over

The cardiovascular consequences of fatiguing expiratory muscle work in otherwise resting healthy humans.

Authors :
Hardy, Tim A.
Paula-Ribeiro, Marcelle
Silva, Bruno M.
Lyall, Gemma K.
Birch, Karen M.
Ferguson, Carrie
Taylor, Bryan J.
Source :
Journal of Applied Physiology; Feb2021, Vol. 130 Issue 2, p421-434, 14p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

In 11 healthy adults (25 ± 4 yr; 2 female, 9 male subjects), we investigated the effect of expiratory resistive loaded breathing [65% maximal expiratory mouth pressure (MEP), 15 breaths·min−1, duty cycle 0.5; ERL<subscript>Pm</subscript>] on mean arterial pressure (MAP), leg vascular resistance (LVR), and leg blood flow (Q̇<subscript>L</subscript>). On a separate day, a subset of five male subjects performed ERL targeting 65% of maximal expiratory gastric pressure (ERL<subscript>Pga</subscript>). ERL-induced expiratory muscle fatigue was confirmed by a 17 ± 5% reduction in MEP (P < 0.05) and a 16 ± 12% reduction in the gastric twitch pressure response to magnetic nerve stimulation (P = 0.09) from before to after ERL<subscript>Pm</subscript> and ERL<subscript>Pga</subscript>, respectively. From rest to task failure in ERL<subscript>Pm</subscript> and ERL<subscript>Pga</subscript>, MAP increased (ERL<subscript>Pm</subscript> = 31 ± 10 mmHg, ERL<subscript>Pga</subscript> = 18 ± 9 mmHg, both P < 0.05), but group mean LVR and Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> were unchanged (ERL<subscript>Pm</subscript>: LVR = 0.78 ± 0.21 vs. 0.97 ± 0.36 mmHg·mL<superscript>−1</superscript>·min, Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> = 133 ± 34 vs. 152 ± 74 mL·min<superscript>−1</superscript>; ERL<subscript>Pga</subscript>: LVR = 0.70 ± 0.21 vs. 0.84 ± 0.33 mmHg·mL<superscript>−1</superscript>·min, Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> = 160 ± 48 vs. 179 ± 110 mL·min<superscript>−1</superscript>) (all P ≥ 0.05). Interestingly, Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> during ERL<subscript>Pga</subscript> oscillated within each breath, increasing (∼66%) and decreasing (∼50%) relative to resting values during resisted expirations and unresisted inspirations, respectively. In conclusion, fatiguing expiratory muscle work did not affect group mean LVR or Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> in otherwise resting humans. We speculate that any sympathetically mediated peripheral vasoconstriction was counteracted by transient mechanical effects of high intra-abdominal pressures during ERL. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Fatiguing expiratory muscle work in otherwise resting humans elicits an increase in sympathetic motor outflow; whether limb blood flow (Q̇<subscript>L</subscript>) and leg vascular resistance (LVR) are affected remains unknown. We found that fatiguing expiratory resistive loaded breathing (ERL) did not affect group mean Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> or LVR. However, within-breath oscillations in Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> may reflect a sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction that was counteracted by transient increases in Q̇<subscript>L</subscript> due to the mechanical effects of high intra-abdominal pressure during ERL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
87507587
Volume :
130
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Applied Physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148843401
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00116.2020