Back to Search Start Over

Advantages of patient-specific cutting guides with disposable instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a case control study.

Authors :
Moerenhout, Kevin
Allami, Behrang
Gkagkalis, Georgios
Guyen, Olivier
Jolles, Brigitte M.
Source :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research; 3/15/2021, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p1-6, 6p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is most frequently planned using conventional two-dimensional weight-bearing lower limb radiographs and is performed with conventional femoral and tibial cutting guides. Questions have been raised about the accuracy of conventional TKA instrumentation and planning for an anatomically standard or complex joint. Use of computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating and patient-specific cutting guides printed in 3D has shown improved postoperative lower limb alignment parameters. This case-control study compared costs and operative times of using CT-based, patient-specific, single-use instruments versus conventional metal instruments for TKA. Methods: In this case-control, retrospective chart review, all TKAs were performed by one senior surgeon, using the F.I.R.S.T. posterior-stabilised knee prosthesis (Symbios, CH), with a similar protocol and identical operating room setup. Group A included 51 TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting guides and conventional metal instruments. Group B included 49 TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting guides and patient-specific, single-use instrumentation. Operation duration, number of instrumentation trays and sterilisation costs were evaluated. Results: The groups were similar for age, body mass index, hip-knee-ankle angle and operation duration. The mean number of instrumentation trays was 8.0 ± 0.8 for group A (controls) and 5.1 ± 0.9 for group B (p<0.001). The mean sterilisation costs were 380 ± 47 Swiss Francs (CHF) for group A and 243 ± 55 CHF for group B (p<0.001), for a mean cost reduction of 130.50 CHF per intervention in group B. The time interval between two consecutive surgeries was 24 min for group A and 18 min for group B. There were no adverse events or complications, instrument-related or otherwise. Conclusion: Compared to conventional instrumentation, use of patient-specific, single-use instruments for TKA reduced the number of instrumentation trays by more than one-third and saved 36% in sterilisation costs. If fabrication costs of single-use instruments are included by the company, the total cost is significantly diminished. There was no operative time advantage for single-use instrumentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1749799X
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149286812
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02310-y