Back to Search Start Over

Combination antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibition and anti‐PD1 immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of safety, tolerance, and clinical outcomes.

Authors :
Laccetti, Andrew L.
Garmezy, Benjamin
Xiao, Lianchun
Economides, Minas
Venkatesan, Aradhana
Gao, Jianjun
Jonasch, Eric
Corn, Paul
Zurita‐Saavedra, Amado
Brown, Landon C.
Kao, Chester
Kinsey, Emily N.
Gupta, Rajan T.
Harrison, Michael R.
Armstrong, Andrew J.
George, Daniel J.
Tannir, Nizar
Msaouel, Pavlos
Shah, Amishi
Zhang, Tian
Source :
Cancer Medicine; Apr2021, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p2341-2349, 9p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Two separate antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) combinations are FDA‐approved as front‐line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Little is known about off‐protocol and post‐front‐line experience with combination TKI–IO approaches. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of mRCC patients who received combination TKI–IO post‐first‐line therapy between November 2015 and January 2019 at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Chart review detailed patient characteristics, treatments, toxicity, and survival. Independent radiologists, blinded to clinical data, assessed best radiographic response using RECIST v1.1. Results: We identified 48 mRCC patients for inclusion: median age 65 years, 75.0% clear cell histology, 68.8% IMDC intermediate risk, and median two prior systemic therapies. TKI–IO combinations included nivolumab–cabozantinib (N +C; 24 patients), nivolumab–pazopanib (N+P; 13), nivolumab–axitinib (6), nivolumab–lenvatinib (2), and nivolumab–ipilimumab–cabozantinib (3). The median progression‐free survival was 11.6 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Response data were available in 45 patients: complete response (CR; n = 3, 6.7%), partial response (PR; 20, 44.4%), stable disease (SD; 19, 42.2%), and progressive disease (3, 6.7%). Overall response rate was 51% and disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 93%. Only one patient had a grade ≥3 adverse event. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting off‐label use of combination TKI–IO for mRCC. TKI–IO combinations, particularly N+P and N+C, are well tolerated and efficacious. Although further prospective research is essential, slow disease progression on IO or TKI monotherapy may be safely controlled with addition of either TKI or IO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20457634
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149411953
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3812