Back to Search Start Over

Estimation of Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation Coverage in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River Based on Sentinel-2A Data.

Authors :
Guo, Zengkun
Kurban, Alishir
Ablekim, Abdimijit
Wu, Shupu
Van de Voorde, Tim
Azadi, Hossein
Maeyer, Philippe De
Dufatanye Umwali, Edovia
Hively, W. Dean
Source :
Remote Sensing; Apr2021, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p1458, 1p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Estimating the fractional coverage of the photosynthetic vegetation (f<subscript>PV</subscript>) and non-photosynthetic vegetation (f<subscript>NPV</subscript>) is essential for assessing the growth conditions of vegetation growth in arid areas and for monitoring environmental changes and desertification. The aim of this study was to estimate the f<subscript>PV</subscript>, f<subscript>NPV</subscript> and the fractional coverage of the bare soil (f<subscript>BS</subscript>) in the lower reaches of Tarim River quantitatively. The study acquired field data during September 2020 for obtaining the f<subscript>PV</subscript>, f<subscript>NPV</subscript> and f<subscript>BS</subscript>. Firstly, six photosynthetic vegetation indices (PVIs) and six non-photosynthetic vegetation indices (NPVIs) were calculated from Sentinel-2A image data. The PVIs include normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), ratio vegetation index (RVI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), modified soil adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI), reduced simple ratio index (RSR) and global environment monitoring index (GEMI). Meanwhile, normalized difference index (NDI), normalized difference tillage index (NDTI), normalized difference senescent vegetation index (NDSVI), soil tillage index (STI), shortwave infrared ratio (SWIR32) and dead fuel index (DFI) constitutes the NPVIs. We then established linear regression model of different PVIs and f<subscript>PV</subscript>, and NPVIs and f<subscript>NPV</subscript>, respectively. Finally, we applied the GEMI-DFI model to analyze the spatial and seasonal variation of f<subscript>PV</subscript> and f<subscript>NPV</subscript> in the study area in 2020. The results showed that the GEMI and f<subscript>PV</subscript> revealed the best correlation coefficient (R<superscript>2</superscript>) of 0.59, while DFI and f<subscript>NPV</subscript> had the best correlation of R<superscript>2</superscript> = 0.45. The accuracy of f<subscript>PV</subscript>, f<subscript>NPV</subscript> and f<subscript>BS</subscript> based on the determined PVIs and NPVIs as calculated by GEMI-DFI model are 0.69, 0.58 and 0.43, respectively. The f<subscript>PV</subscript> and f<subscript>NPV</subscript> are consistent with the vegetation phonological development characteristics in the study area. The study concluded that the application of the GEMI-DFI model in the f<subscript>PV</subscript> and f<subscript>NPV</subscript> estimation was sufficiently significant for monitoring the spatial and seasonal variation of vegetation and its ecological functions in arid areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20724292
Volume :
13
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Remote Sensing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150432794
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081458