Back to Search Start Over

Randomized comparison between bare-metal stent plus colchicine versus drug-eluting stent alone in prevention of clinical adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors :
Correa-Sadouet, Camila
Rodríguez-Granillo, A Matías
Gallardo, Camila
Mieres, Juan
Fontana, Lucía
Curotto, María Valeria
Wainer, Pedro
Allende, N Gustavo
Fernández-Pereira, Carlos
M Vetulli, Héctor
la Hoz, R Pérez de
Kastrati, Adnan
Rodríguez, Alfredo E
Rodríguez-Granillo, A Matías
Allende, N Gustavo
M Vetulli, Héctor
la Hoz, R Pérez de
ORCA investigators
Source :
Future Cardiology; Jul2021, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p539-547, 9p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The use of colchicine is associated with a significant reduction of cardiac adverse events in patients with coronary artery disease. Past small randomized trials with oral immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory therapies have demonstrated a reduction of adverse clinical events after bare metal stent implantation. The potential role of adjunctive colchicine after bare-metal stent implantation, compared with drug-eluting stent alone, is unknown. The primary end point of the study will be to compare cost-effectiveness at 1 year of follow-up of coronary intervention with bare-metal stent implantation plus 1 mg of colchicine during 3 months versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation alone. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04382443. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14796678
Volume :
17
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Future Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150910364
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2020-0161