Back to Search Start Over

Gender imbalance amongst promotion and leadership in academic surgical programs in Canada: A cross-sectional Investigation.

Authors :
Hunter, Jennifer
Crofts, Helen
Keehn, Alysha
Schlagintweit, Sofie
Luc, Jessica G. Y.
Lefaivre, Kelly A.
Source :
PLoS ONE; 8/26/2021, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p1-15, 15p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Women are underrepresented at higher levels of promotion or leadership despite the increasing number of women physicians. In surgery, this has been compounded by historical underrepresentation. With a nation-wide focus on the importance of diversity, our aim was to provide a current snapshot of gender representation in Canadian universities. Methods: This cross-sectional online website review assessed the current faculty listings for 17 university-affiliated academic surgical training departments across Canada in the 2019/2020 academic year. Gender diversity of academic surgical faculty was assessed across surgical disciplines. Additionally, gender diversity in career advancement, as described by published leadership roles, promotion and faculty appointment, was analyzed. Results: Women surgeons are underrepresented across Canadian surgical specialties (totals: 2,689 men versus 531 women). There are significant differences in the gender representation of surgeons between specialties and between universities, regardless of specialty. Women surgeons had a much lower likelihood of being at the highest levels of promotion (OR: 0.269, 95% CI: 0.179–0.405). Men surgeons were statistically more likely to hold academic leadership positions than women (p = 0.0002). Women surgeons had a much lower likelihood of being at the highest levels of leadership (OR: 0.372, 95% CI: 0.216–0.641). Discussion: This study demonstrates that women surgeons are significantly underrepresented at the highest levels of academic promotion and leadership in Canada. Our findings allow for a direct comparison between Canadian surgical subspecialties and universities. Individual institutions can use these data to critically appraise diversity policies already in place, assess their workforce and apply a metric from which change can be measured. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
16
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152093497
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256742