Back to Search Start Over

Contrasting lightning projection using the lightning potential index adapted in a convection-permitting regional climate model.

Authors :
Brisson, Erwan
Blahak, Ulrich
Lucas-Picher, Philippe
Purr, Christopher
Ahrens, Bodo
Source :
Climate Dynamics; Oct2021, Vol. 57 Issue 7/8, p2037-2051, 15p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Lightning climate change projections show large uncertainties caused by limited empirical knowledge and strong assumptions inherent to coarse-grid climate modeling. This study addresses the latter issue by implementing and applying the lightning potential index parameterization (LPI) into a fine-grid convection-permitting regional climate model (CPM). This setup takes advantage of the explicit representation of deep convection in CPMs and allows for process-oriented LPI inputs such as vertical velocity within convective cells and coexistence of microphysical hydrometeor types, which are known to contribute to charge separation mechanisms. The LPI output is compared to output from a simpler flash rate parameterization, namely the CAPE × PREC parameterization, applied in a non-CPM on a coarser grid. The LPI's implementation into the regional climate model COSMO-CLM successfully reproduces the observed lightning climatology, including its latitudinal gradient, its daily and hourly probability distributions, and its diurnal and annual cycles. Besides, the simulated temperature dependence of lightning reflects the observed dependency. The LPI outperforms the CAPE × PREC parameterization in all applied diagnostics. Based on this satisfactory evaluation, we used the LPI to a climate change projection under the RCP8.5 scenario. For the domain under investigation centered over Germany, the LPI projects a decrease of 4.8 % in flash rate by the end of the century, in opposition to a projected increase of 17.4 % as projected using the CAPE × PREC parameterization. The future decrease of LPI occurs mostly during the summer afternoons and is related to (i) a change in convection occurrence and (ii) changes in the microphysical mixing. The two parameterizations differ because of different convection occurrences in the CPM and non-CPM and because of changes in the microphysical mixing, which is only represented in the LPI lightning parameterization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09307575
Volume :
57
Issue :
7/8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Climate Dynamics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152503976
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05791-z