Back to Search Start Over

Reliability of the prediction model for landslide displacement with step-like behavior.

Authors :
Fu, Zhiyong
Long, Jingjing
Chen, Wenqiang
Li, Changdong
Zhang, Haikuan
Yao, Wenmin
Source :
Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk Assessment; Nov2021, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p2335-2353, 19p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Based on the machine learning algorithms, prediction models for landslide displacement with step-like behavior in the reservoir area were established for landslides prevention and reduction; these models could predict a given test set very well. However, due to the length and the sequence of the training set in prediction models, the predictive ability of these prediction models could not be evaluated accurately if just validated with a given test set. To solve the problem, a hybrid reliability model was proposed. Complimentary ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD) algorithm was used to decompose the accumulated displacement into the trend displacement and the periodic displacement firstly. The Gauss function was used to predict the trend displacement, and the random forest (RF) and back propagation neural network (BPNN) algorithms were employed to predict the periodic displacement. Furthermore, a novel performance function for the reliability analysis of the displacement prediction model was derived to address failure probabilities in different cases. The Baijiabao landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area was taken as an example for reliability analysis of the prediction model for landslide displacement with step-like behavior, and the predictive ability of the CEEMD-RF model and the CEEMD-BPNN model were compared. The results indicated that the CEEMD-RF model and CEEMD-BPNN model both can accurately predict the accumulated displacement of the given test set; the predictive value obtained with the CEEMD-RF model or the CEEMD-BPNN model showed uncertainties of the prediction model for landslide displacement and the predictive ability of the CEEMD-RF model was more reliable than the CEEMD-BPNN model under different cases. The failure probability proposed in the paper could evaluate the predictive ability of the model more accurately and comprehensively compared with the existing assessment indices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14363240
Volume :
35
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk Assessment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152975759
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02029-6