Back to Search Start Over

Force–Velocity Vs. Power–Velocity Relationships: Which Method Provides the Maximum Power and Optimal Velocity with Higher Reliability during the Leg Cycle-Ergometer and Bench Press Throw Exercises?

Authors :
Pérez-Castilla, Alejandro
García-Ramos, Amador
Source :
Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science; Oct-Dec 2021, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p294-305, 12p, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

An a-posteriori multicentre reliability study was conducted to compare the reliability and magnitude of the maximum power (P<subscript>max</subscript>) and optimal velocity (V<subscript>opt</subscript>) between the force-power-velocity relationships during the leg cycle-ergometer and bench press throw exercises. The force-power-velocity relationships were determined in two separate sessions considering the values of force, velocity, and power collected under multiple loads. The force–velocity relationship was also determined from the force and velocity values collected under only the two most distant loads. Reliability of all regression models was high for P<subscript>max</subscript> and V<subscript>opt</subscript> during the leg cycle-ergometer (CV<subscript>range</subscript>: 1.73–2.98%) and for P<subscript>max</subscript> during the bench press throw (CV<subscript>range</subscript>: 4.47–4.73%), while the reliability was acceptable for V<subscript>opt</subscript> during the bench press throw (CV<subscript>range</subscript>: 6.52–7.34%). Significant differences between the force-power-velocity relationships were observed for both P<subscript>max</subscript> and V<subscript>opt</subscript> (P <.001). All regression models can be confidently used to determine P<subscript>max</subscript> and V<subscript>opt</subscript>, but these should not be used interchangeably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1091367X
Volume :
25
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153368924
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1878184