Back to Search
Start Over
The strategy of model building in climate science.
- Source :
- Synthese; Dec2021, Vol. 199 Issue 1/2, p745-765, 21p
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- In the 1960s, theoretical biologist Richard Levins criticised modellers in his own discipline of population biology for pursuing the "brute force" strategy of building hyper-realistic models. Instead of exclusively chasing complexity, Levins advocated for the use of multiple different kinds of complementary models, including much simpler ones. In this paper, I argue that the epistemic challenges Levins attributed to the brute force strategy still apply to state-of-the-art climate models today: they have big appetites for unattainable data, they are limited by computational tractability, and they are incomprehensible to the human modeller. Along the lines Levins described, this uncertainty generates a trade-off between realistic, precise models with predictive power and simple, highly idealised models that facilitate understanding. In addition to building ensembles of highly complex dynamical models, climate modellers can address model uncertainty by comparing models of different types, such as dynamical and data-driven models, and by systematically comparing models at different levels of what climate modellers call the model hierarchy. Despite its age, Levins' paper remains incredibly insightful and should be considered an important entry into the philosophy of computational modelling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- CLIMATOLOGY
ATMOSPHERIC models
POPULATION biology
BIOLOGISTS
PREDICTION models
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00397857
- Volume :
- 199
- Issue :
- 1/2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Synthese
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 153650805
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02707-y