Cite
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
MLA
Swierz, Mateusz J., et al. “Similarities, Reliability and Gaps in Assessing the Quality of Conduct of Systematic Reviews Using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: Systematic Survey of Nutrition Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 21, no. 1, Nov. 2021, pp. 1–10. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01457-w.
APA
Swierz, M. J., Storman, D., Zajac, J., Koperny, M., Weglarz, P., Staskiewicz, W., Gorecka, M., Skuza, A., Wach, A., Kaluzinska, K., Bochenek-Cibor, J., Johnston, B. C., & Bala, M. M. (2021). Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01457-w
Chicago
Swierz, Mateusz J., Dawid Storman, Joanna Zajac, Magdalena Koperny, Paulina Weglarz, Wojciech Staskiewicz, Magdalena Gorecka, et al. 2021. “Similarities, Reliability and Gaps in Assessing the Quality of Conduct of Systematic Reviews Using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: Systematic Survey of Nutrition Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 21 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01457-w.