Fault Detection Method and Simulation Based on Abnormal Data Analysis in Wireless Sensor Networks.

With the rapid development of Internet of things and information technology, wireless sensor network technology is widely used in industrial monitoring. However, limited by the architecture characteristics, software and hardware characteristics, and complex external environmental factors of wireless sensor networks, there are often serious abnormalities in the monitoring data of wireless sensor networks, which further affect the judgment and response of users. Based on this, this paper optimizes and improves the fault detection algorithm of related abnormal data analysis in wireless sensor networks from two angles and verifies the algorithm at the same time. In the first level, aiming at the problem of insufficient spatial cooperation faced by the network abnormal data detection level, this paper first establishes a stable neighbor screening model based on the wireless network and filters and analyzes the reliability of the network cooperative data nodes and then establishes the detection data stability evaluation model by using the spatiotemporal correlation corresponding to the data nodes. Realize abnormal data detection. On the second level, aiming at the problem of wireless network abnormal event detection, this paper proposes a spatial clustering optimization algorithm, which mainly clusters the detection data flow in the wireless network time window through the clustering algorithm, and analyzes the clustering data, so as to realize the detection of network abnormal events, so as to retain the characteristics of events and further classify the abnormal data events. This paper will verify the realizability and superiority of the improved optimization algorithm through simulation technology. Experiments show that the fault detection rate based on abnormal data analysis is as high as 97%, which is 5% higher than the traditional fault detection rate. At the same time, the corresponding fault false detection rate is low and controlled below 1%. The efficiency of this algorithm is about 10% higher than that of the traditional algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]