Back to Search
Start Over
Postoperative Reduction Quality May Be the Most Important Factor That Causes Worse Functional Outcomes in Open and Closed Pelvic Fractures.
- Source :
- World Journal of Surgery; Mar2022, Vol. 46 Issue 3, p568-576, 9p
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Background: Data on the functional outcomes of patients with open pelvic fractures after osteosynthesis are limited, and whether open fracture is a risk factor for worse outcomes, as compared with closed fracture, remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the functional outcomes of patients with open and closed pelvic fractures and evaluate potential factors that might affect outcomes. Methods: Overall, 19 consecutive patients with open pelvic fractures and 78 patients with closed pelvic fractures between January 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All fractures were surgically treated, with a minimal follow-up period of three years. Patients' demographic profile, associated injuries, management protocol, quality of reduction, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Results: Patients with open pelvic fractures had higher new injury severity score, higher incidence of diverting colostomy, and longer length of stay. Both radiological and functional evaluations revealed no significant differences between the two groups at 1-year and 3-year evaluations. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified poor radiological outcomes (using Lefaivre criteria) and longer length of stay as risk factors for worse short-term functional outcomes. At 3-year evaluation, fair-to-poor radiological outcomes (using Matta/Tornetta and Lefaivre criteria) and the presence of diverting colostomy were potential risk factors. Conclusions: Compared with closed pelvic fracture, open pelvic fracture was not an indicator of worse functional outcomes. Functional outcomes may be comparable between patients with open and closed pelvic fractures at different time points within three years postoperatively. Achieving anatomical reduction in a fracture is crucial, because it might affect patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03642313
- Volume :
- 46
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 154980046
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06386-9