Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG for the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with gastric cancer: a bicentric retrospective study.

Authors :
Jiang, Donglang
Chen, Xing
You, Zhiwen
Wang, Hao
Zhang, Xiaoyun
Li, Xiuming
Ren, Shuhua
Huang, Qi
Hua, Fengchun
Guan, Yihui
Zhao, Jun
Xie, Fang
Source :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging; Jan2022, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p732-742, 11p, 3 Color Photographs, 3 Diagrams, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: The low sensitivity of [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG) for the diagnosis of gastric cancer limits its application. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential advantage of [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 over [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG in the evaluation of gastric cancer. Methods: This was a bicentric retrospective analysis of a prospective parent study (clinical trial: HS-KY-2020–826 (Huashan Hospital) and DF-2020–102 (Shanghai East Hospital)). Thirty-eight patients with gastric cancer (31 with adenocarcinoma and 7 with signet ring cell carcinoma) were included in this study. All of the participants underwent [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG imaging by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance (MR). The scans were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<subscript>max</subscript>) was calculated. Histopathological findings obtained from biopsy or resected surgical specimens were used as a reference for the final diagnosis. Results: For the detection of primary gastric cancer, the sensitivities of [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG PET were 100% (38/38) and 82% (31/38), respectively (P = 0.016). Four cases of adenocarcinoma and three cases of signet ring cell carcinoma were missed by [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG PET. The mean SUV<subscript>max</subscript> of [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in tumours greater than 4 cm (11.0 ± 4.5) was higher than that in tumours less than 4 cm (4.5 ± 3.2) (P = 0.0015). The mean SUV<subscript>max</subscript> of [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was higher in T2–4 tumours (9.7 ± 4.4) than in T1 tumours (3.1 ± 1.5) (P = 0.0002). For the detection of metastatic lesions, the sensitivities of [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG PET in 10 patients with regional lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were 6/10 and 5/10, respectively. Conclusion: In this selected cohort, [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET had a superior detection rate than [<superscript>18</superscript>F]-FDG PET for primary gastric cancer. [<superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET could provide better performance with regard to gastric cancer diagnosis and staging. Prospective clinical trials are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16197070
Volume :
49
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
154982375
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05441-w