Back to Search Start Over

Comparing geomorphological maps made manually and by deep learning.

Authors :
van der Meij, W. Marijn
Meijles, Erik W.
Marcos, Diego
Harkema, Tom T. L.
Candel, Jasper H. J.
Maas, Gilbert J.
Source :
Earth Surface Processes & Landforms; 3/30/2022, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p1089-1107, 19p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Geomorphological maps provide information on the relief, genesis and shape of the earth's surface and are widely used in sustainable spatial developments. The quality of geomorphological maps is however rarely assessed or reported, which limits their applicability. Moreover, older geomorphological maps often do not meet current quality requirements and require updating. This updating is time‐consuming and because of its qualitative nature difficult to reproduce, but can be supported by novel computational methods. In this paper, we address these issues by (1) quantifying the uncertainty associated with manual geomorphological mapping, (2) exploring the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for semi‐automated geomorphological mapping and (3) testing the sensitivity of CNNs to uncertainties in manually created evaluation data. We selected a test area in the Dutch push‐moraine district with a pronounced relief and a high variety of landforms. For this test area we developed five manually created geomorphological maps and 27 automatically created landform maps using CNNs. The resulting manual maps are similar on a regional level. We could identify the causes of disagreement between the maps on a local level, which often related to differences in mapping experience, choices in delineation and different interpretations of the legend. Coordination of mapping efforts and field validation are necessary to create accurate and precise maps. CNNs perform well in identifying landforms and geomorphological units, but fail at correct delineation. The human geomorphologist remains necessary to correct the delineation and classification of the computed maps. The uncertainty in the manually created data that are used to train and evaluate CNNs have a large effect on the model performance and evaluation. This also advocates for coordinated mapping efforts to ensure the quality of manually created training and test data. Further model development and data processing are required before CNNs can act as standalone mapping techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01979337
Volume :
47
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Earth Surface Processes & Landforms
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155837529
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5305