Back to Search Start Over

The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors :
Wei, Qi
Yan, Yu-Jing
Wu, Ge-Ge
Ye, Xi-Rong
Jiang, Fan
Liu, Jie
Wang, Gang
Wang, Yi
Song, Juan
Pan, Zhi-Ping
Hu, Jin-Hua
Jin, Chao-Ying
Wang, Xiang
Dietrich, Christoph F.
Cui, Xin-Wu
Source :
European Radiology; Jun2022, Vol. 32 Issue 6, p4046-4055, 10p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software on ultrasound in distinguishing benign and malignant breast masses and avoiding unnecessary biopsy. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study included patients who were scheduled for pathological diagnosis of breast masses between April 2019 and November 2020. Ultrasound images, videos, CAD analysis, and BI-RADS were obtained. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated and compared with radiologists. Results: Overall, 901 breast masses in 901 patients were enrolled in this study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CAD software were 89.6%, 94.2%, 87.0%, 80.4%, and 96.3, respectively, in the long-axis section; 89.0%, 91.4%, 87.7%, 80.8%, and 94.7%, respectively, in the short-axis section. With BI-RADS 4a as the cut-off value, CAD software has a higher AUC (0.906 vs 0.734 vs 0.696, all p < 0.001) than both experienced and less experienced radiologists. With BI-RADS 4b as the cut-off value, CAD software showed better AUC than less experienced radiologists (0.906 vs 0.874, p < 0.001), but not superior to experienced radiologists (0.906 vs 0.883, p = 0.057). After the application of CAD software, the unnecessary biopsy rate of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 was significantly decreased (33.0% vs 11.9%, 37.8% vs 14.5%), and the malignant rate of biopsy in category 4a was significantly increased (11.6% vs 40.7%, 7.4% vs 34.9%, all p < 0.001). Conclusions: CAD software on ultrasound can be used as an effective auxiliary diagnostic tool for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses and reducing unnecessary biopsy. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 03887598) Key Points: • Prospective multicenter study showed that computer-aided diagnosis software provides greater diagnostic confidence for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. • Computer-aided diagnosis software can help radiologists reduce unnecessary biopsy. • The management of patients with breast masses becomes more appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
32
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157006524
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08452-1