Back to Search Start Over

Left ventricular function, strain, and infarct characteristics in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions.

Authors :
Demirkiran, Ahmet
Hoeven, Nina W van der
Janssens, Gladys N
Lemkes, Jorrit S
Everaars, Henk
Ven, Peter M van de
Pouderoijen, Nikki van
Cauteren, Yvonne J M van
Leeuwen, Maarten A H van
Nap, Alexander
Teunissen, Paul F
Hopman, Luuk H G A
Bekkers, Sebastiaan C A M
Smulders, Martijn W
Royen, Niels van
Rossum, Albert C van
Robbers, Lourens F H J
Nijveldt, Robin
Source :
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging; Jun2022, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p836-845, 10p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Aims This study aims to explore cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left ventricular (LV) function, strain, and infarct size characteristics in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (TSTEMI) compared to patients with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively). Methods and results In total, 407 patients were enrolled in this multicentre observational prospective cohort study. All patients underwent CMR examination 2–8 days after the index event. CMR cine imaging was performed for functional assessment and late gadolinium enhancement to determine infarct size and identify microvascular obstruction (MVO). TSTEMI patients demonstrated the highest LV ejection fraction and the most preserved global LV strain (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial) across the three groups (overall P  ≤ 0.001). The CMR-defined infarction was less frequently observed in TSTEMI than in STEMI patients [77 (65%) vs. 124 (98%), P  < 0.001] but was comparable with NSTEMI patients [77 (65%) vs. 66 (70%), P  = 0.44]. A remarkably smaller infarct size was seen in TSTEMI compared to STEMI patients [1.4 g (0.0–3.9) vs. 13.5 g (5.3–26.8), P  < 0.001], whereas infarct size was not significantly different from that in NSTEMI patients [1.4 g (0.0–3.9) vs. 2.1 g (0.0–8.6), P  = 0.06]. Whilst the presence of MVO was less frequent in TSTEMI compared to STEMI patients [5 (4%) vs. 53 (31%), P  < 0.001], no significant difference was seen compared to NSTEMI patients [5 (4%) vs. 5 (5%), P  = 0.72]. Conclusion TSTEMI yielded favourable cardiac LV function, strain, and infarct-related scar mass compared to STEMI and NSTEMI. LV function and infarct characteristics of TSTEMI tend to be more similar to NSTEMI than STEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20472404
Volume :
23
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157332003
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab114