Back to Search Start Over

Performance of C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, TAT Complex, and Factor VIII in Addition to D-Dimer in the Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care Patients.

Authors :
Heerink, Jorn S
Gemen, Eugenie
Oudega, Ruud
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Hopstaken, Rogier
Kusters, Ron
Source :
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine; Mar2022, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p444-455, 12p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: In primary care, D-dimer—combined with a clinical assessment—is recommended for ruling-out venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, D-dimer testing frequently yields false-positive results, notably in the elderly, and the search for novel biomarkers thus continues. We assessed the added diagnostic value of 4 promising laboratory tests. Methods: Plasma samples from 256 primary care patients suspected of VTE were collected. We explored added value (beyond D-dimer) of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), thrombin–antithrombin III complex (TAT-c), and factor VIII (FVIII). Diagnostic performance of these biomarkers was assessed univariably and by estimating their area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Added diagnostic potential beyond D-dimer testing was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Plasma samples of 237 VTE-suspected patients were available for analysis—36 patients (25%) confirmed deep vein thrombosis, 11 patients (12%) pulmonary embolism. Apart from D-dimer, only CRP, and FVIII levels appeared to be higher in patients with VTE compared to patients without VTE. The AUCs for these 3 markers were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69–0.84) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68–0.83), respectively, whereas the AUC for D-dimer was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94). Combining these biomarkers in a multivariable logistic model with D-dimer did not improve these AUCs meaningfully. Conclusions: In our dataset, we were unable to demonstrate any added diagnostic performance beyond D-dimer testing of novel biomarkers in patients suspected of VTE in primary care. As such, D-dimer testing appears to remain the best choice in the exclusion of clinically suspected VTE in this setting. Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register NL5974. (METC protocol number: 16-356/M; NL56475.041.16.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24757241
Volume :
7
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157486319
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfab094