Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices Measured via Proximal and Aerial Sensors for Assessing N Status and Predicting Grain Yield in Rice Cropping Systems.

Authors :
Rehman, Telha H.
Lundy, Mark E.
Linquist, Bruce A.
Source :
Remote Sensing; Jun2022, Vol. 14 Issue 12, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 18p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Reflectance-based vegetation indices can be valuable for assessing crop nitrogen (N) status and predicting grain yield. While proximal sensors have been widely studied in agriculture, there is increasing interest in utilizing aerial sensors. Given that few studies have compared aerial and proximal sensors, the objective of this study was to quantitatively compare the sensitivity of aerially sensed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Red-Edge Index (NDRE) and proximally sensed NDVI for assessing total N uptake at panicle initiation (PI-N<subscript>UP</subscript>) and predicting grain yield in rice. Nitrogen response trials were established over a 3-year period (10 site-years) at various locations throughout the Sacramento Valley rice growing region of California. At PI, a multispectral unmanned aircraft system (UAS) was used to measure NDVI<subscript>UAS</subscript> and NDRE<subscript>UAS</subscript> (average ground sampling distance: 3.7 cm pixel<superscript>−1</superscript>), and a proximal GreenSeeker (GS) sensor was used to record NDVI<subscript>GS</subscript>. To enable direct comparisons across the different indices on an equivalent numeric scale, each index was normalized by calculating the Sufficiency-Index (SI) relative to a non-N-limiting plot. Kernel density distributions indicated that NDVI<subscript>UAS</subscript> had a narrower range of values that were poorly differentiated compared to NDVI<subscript>GS</subscript> and NDRE<subscript>UAS</subscript>. The critical PI-N<subscript>UP</subscript> where yields did not increase with higher PI-N<subscript>UP</subscript> averaged 109 kg N ha<superscript>−1</superscript> (±4 kg N ha<superscript>−1</superscript>). The relationship between SI and PI-N<subscript>UP</subscript> for the NDVI<subscript>UAS</subscript> saturated lower than this critical PI-N<subscript>UP</subscript> (96 kg N ha<superscript>−1</superscript>), whereas NDVI<subscript>GS</subscript> and NDRE<subscript>UAS</subscript> saturated at 111 and 130 kg N ha<superscript>−1</superscript>, respectively. This indicates that NDVI<subscript>UAS</subscript> was less suitable for making N management decisions at this crop stage than NDVI<subscript>GS</subscript> and NDRE<subscript>UAS</subscript>. Linear mixed effects models were developed to evaluate how well each SI measured at PI was able to predict grain yield. The NDVI<subscript>UAS</subscript> was least sensitive to variation in yields as reflected by having the highest slope (2.4 Mg ha<superscript>−1</superscript> per 0.1 SI). In contrast, the slopes for NDVI<subscript>GS</subscript> and NDRE<subscript>UAS</subscript> were 0.9 and 1.1 Mg ha<superscript>−1</superscript> per 0.1 SI, respectively, indicating greater sensitivity to yields. Altogether, these results indicate that the ability of vegetation indices to inform crop management decisions depends on the index and the measurement platform used. Both NDVI<subscript>GS</subscript> and NDRE<subscript>UAS</subscript> produced measurements sensitive enough to inform N fertilizer management in this system, whereas NDVI<subscript>UAS</subscript> was more limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20724292
Volume :
14
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Remote Sensing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157823691
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122770