Back to Search
Start Over
Estimating field N2 emissions based on laboratory-quantified N2O/(N2O + N2) ratios and field-quantified N2O emissions.
- Source :
- Journal of Soils & Sediments: Protection, Risk Assessment, & Remediation; Aug2022, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p2196-2208, 13p
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Purpose: The key environmentally beneficial process that substantially removes reactive nitrogen from biosphere is a complete denitrification. The science of measuring and constraining nitrous oxide (N<subscript>2</subscript>O) emissions has advanced significantly; however, despite several attempts, in situ dinitrogen (N<subscript>2</subscript>) measurement is still a great challenge and is poorly understood due to the high atmospheric N<subscript>2</subscript> background. This study aimed at estimating field-scale inferred N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions using data of field N<subscript>2</subscript>O emissions and laboratory-measured N<subscript>2</subscript>O/(N<subscript>2</subscript>O + N<subscript>2</subscript>) ratios and correlating those emissions with the soil-environmental factors. Materials and methods: Closed static chamber and He/O<subscript>2</subscript> direct measurement methods were used at field and laboratory scale, respectively. For each treatment (varying N fertilizer rates), on each sampling date, N<subscript>2</subscript>O and N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions were measured at laboratory and N<subscript>2</subscript>O emissions at field-scale, allowing the calculation of field-scale inferred N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions. Results: The results demonstrate that field-scale inferred cumulative N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions were 1.35, 1.48 and 1.60 times greater than laboratory-measured cumulative N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions in low nitrogen level (LNL), medium nitrogen level (MNL) and high nitrogen level (HNL) treatments, respectively. This suggests that estimating N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions at the field-scale in agricultural soil could give more insight on N cycling processes. Moreover, N fertilizer application rates increased linearly both field and laboratory cumulative N<subscript>2</subscript>O and N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions. Both positive and negative relationships between soil-environmental parameters and N<subscript>2</subscript>O, N<subscript>2</subscript> and their N<subscript>2</subscript>O/(N<subscript>2</subscript>O + N<subscript>2</subscript>) ratios at field and laboratory-based indicate their heterogeneous roles in N<subscript>2</subscript>O formation and reduction processes. Conclusion: The results provide complementary insights into field-scale N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions in agricultural soil and help in closing the knowledge gap in the N balance. Linear relationships between the emissions (N<subscript>2</subscript>O and N<subscript>2</subscript>) and N fertilizer rates observed suggest that climate change mitigation options could be achieved by optimizing the N fertilization rates since N<subscript>2</subscript>O and N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions are enhanced by increasing N inputs. As our results present the field-scale inferred N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions, there is still a need to design a robust methodological approach that will enable researchers to directly quantify field N<subscript>2</subscript> emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- FIELD emission
NITROGEN
CLIMATE change mitigation
FERTILIZER application
ESTIMATES
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14390108
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Soils & Sediments: Protection, Risk Assessment, & Remediation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 158017196
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03212-0