Very low tidal volume, high-frequency ventilation in atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review.

<bold>Background: </bold>Ventilation strategies in atrial fibrillation ablation affect procedure outcomes by influencing catheter stability. Studies have highlighted favorable atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcomes with the use of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) which has been shown to improve lesion durability, energy delivery, and tissue contact. However, this mode of ventilation is not readily available. In this systematic review, we highlight the available data on the use of very low tidal volume, high-frequency ventilation using standard ventilators that aim to provide settings similar to HFJV during AF ablations.<bold>Methods: </bold>Using a combination of search terms in databases and manual searches in bibliographies of identified articles, we reviewed all published data reported in the English language on the use of very low tidal volume with high-frequency ventilation during atrial fibrillation ablation.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 4 manuscripts were identified; 3 cohort studies and 1 case report. The utilization of standard ventilators with a high-frequency, very low tidal volume ventilation strategy appears to closely mimic the catheter stability benefits that HFJV ventilators provide. Across the 3 cohort identified studies, the use of this ventilation strategy was associated with improved catheter stability, tissue contact, and a decrease in radiofrequency time. No increased risk was identified compared to standard ventilation.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>With a purpose of limiting thoracic excursion and cardiac movement, limited and sparse studies have shown improved outcomes with a very low tidal volume, high-frequency ventilation strategy. Additional studies are needed to solidify this easily accessible and widely available mode of ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]